Although zkSync offers many advantages, there are several disadvantages and challenges associated with its use and development. Here are the main ones: Technical and infrastructural shortcomings Difficulty of integration: Implementing zkSync can require significant effort from developers, especially if they are not familiar with Layer 2 technologies and zero-knowledge proofs. Integration may require changes to the architecture of existing applications. Limited support for assets and smart contracts: Although zkSync is compatible with Ethereum, not all tokens and smart contracts can be supported immediately. This limits the options for some projects and users. Early stage of development: zkSync, like many other Layer 2 solutions, is in the early stages of development. This may mean bugs, limited documentation and support, and possible security and stability issues. User and Operational Disadvantages User Training Needed: Users may need time to get used to using zkSync, especially if they are used to working directly with the Ethereum mainnet. This may make mass adoption difficult. Limited Liquidity: Compared to the Ethereum mainnet, liquidity on zkSync may be limited. This can lead to problems executing large transactions or exchanging less popular tokens. Ecosystem and Market Disadvantages Competition: zkSync faces competition from other layer 2 solutions such as Optimistic Rollups, Arbitrum, and others. Each of these solutions has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the market has not yet decided on a leader. Dependency on the Ethereum mainnet: Despite its advantages, zkSync still depends on the Ethereum mainnet for the final settlement of transactions. Issues or congestion on the main network may indirectly impact the performance and cost of using zkSync. Economic and Financial Disadvantages Risk of Token Depreciation: If zkSync uses native tokens to pay transaction fees or other purposes, there is a risk of their depreciation, which could negatively impact users and developers. Cross-Tier Transfer Fees: Transferring funds between the Ethereum mainnet and zkSync may involve additional fees and delays, which may create inconvenience for users. Conclusion Despite these shortcomings, zkSync represents an important and promising solution for scaling Ethereum. However, users and developers should consider these challenges when planning to use zkSync and be prepared for potential issues and the required integration and customization efforts.#ЛюбимыйТокен #zk $ZK