Trending meme tokens capture attention with their rapid gains, but behind the scenes, some harbor risks due to insider wallet clusters.
New tokens often emerge daily, quickly becoming popular or leading the day’s gains. Although typically community-driven, many of these assets remain closely associated with anonymous creators. Investigations into on-chain data have exposed signs of uneven distribution and suspicious wallet activities, pointing to potential market manipulations.
Concentration of ownership in Meme tokens
While popular, meme tokens often show a worrying pattern of ownership concentration. Analysis tools like Bubblemaps have uncovered that numerous tokens are less widely distributed than expected, with significant portions controlled by a few wallets.
This type of cluster formation can naturally occur, such as when exchanges to multiple addresses distribute tokens. However, some clusters indicate that a single entity holds an ample supply portion, which could lead to sudden market moves if these insiders decide to sell.
For instance, the RIZZ token, a recent Solana-based meme project, saw its value plummet by 99% after a livestream that revealed significant wallet clusters. Though the decline wasn’t directly linked to these clusters, the discovery raised concerns about the token’s distribution integrity, suggesting potential setups to manipulate trading volumes.
Examining Token Distribution Fairness
Other tokens display more equitable distributions. The PEPE token, for example, shows a healthier spread, with the primary active cluster traceable to a known exchange wallet. In contrast, TRUMP tokens, also trending, reveal smaller yet active wallet clusters that contribute to high transaction volumes. Meanwhile, Ethereum’s MAGA token demonstrates a pattern of interconnected wallets that actively circulate tokens amongst themselves, which can also raise red flags about the token’s market behavior.
Newly launched tokens like APE have shown troubling signs, with over 11% of the supply locked within a non-exchange cluster, engaging in circular transactions. Similarly, Trump Coin (DJT), initiated by Martin Shkreli, initially had all tokens concentrated in one cluster, pointing to potential insider strategies during its early distribution phases.
Patterns such as these underscore the risks in early token trading, where so-called “snipers” might acquire large portions of the supply to influence market dynamics later. This behavior not only affects token prices but also challenges fair distribution efforts.
Older tokens also exhibit suspicious clusters
Not limited to new launches, even established meme tokens like Book of Meme (BOME) on Solana have undergone significant cluster formations. A primary wallet holding over 53% of BOME suggests concentrated ownership possibly linked to a considerable exchange like Binance2, based on transaction patterns analyzed via Solscan.
Similarly, DogWifHat (WIF) tokens are primarily held by ByBit and Binance exchanges, emphasizing the high concentration and liquidity risks associated with such meme tokens. These findings indicate that new and old tokens can be subject to market manipulations and require investor scrutiny.
The presence and behavior of these wallet clusters not only reflect on individual tokens and illustrate broader market risks. Investors and regulators must monitor these patterns, as they can lead to abrupt price movements and might indicate underlying issues with token distribution and market fairness. While meme tokens can offer quick gains, they pose significant risks that could lead to equally rapid losses if not carefully managed.
The post Risks in Trending Meme Tokens: Insights from Insider Wallet Cluster first appeared on Coinfea.