رؤى Rabbi Hassain(@M1NX)

--

Hamster Kombat is Scam #moonbix 
#HMSTR #HAMSTER 
$HMSTR
#

إخلاء المسؤولية: تتضمن آراء أطراف خارجية. ليست نصيحةً مالية. يُمكن أن تحتوي على مُحتوى مُمول. اطلع على الشروط والأحكام.

639

0

الردود 0

استكشف أحدث أخبار العملات الرقمية

⚡️ كُن جزءًا من أحدث النقاشات في مجال العملات الرقمية

💬 تفاعل مع صنّاع المُحتوى المُفضّلين لديك

👍 استمتع بالمحتوى الذي يثير اهتمامك

البريد الإلكتروني / رقم الهاتف

صانع مُحتوى ذو صلة

Rabbi Hassain

@M1NX

استكشف المزيد من صناع المُحتوى

airdrop

--

$SOL The debate surrounding Ripple, XRP Ledger (XRPL) and the possibility of XRP’s inclusion in a U.S. crypto reserve shows no signs of slowing down. The conversation, already charged with competing ideologies, took another turn when accusations of centralization were raised against Ripple. Some within the crypto community, particularly Bitcoin supporters, remain skeptical of XRP's structure, with prominent voices questioning Ripple’s role and influence. card One of the loudest critics is Pierre Rochard, VP of Research at Riot Platforms, a major Bitcoin mining firm. He has argued that Ripple could theoretically fork the XRPL software, alter escrow locks, or even introduce trillions moreXRP into the supply. For him, the control Ripple allegedly holds undermines any claims of decentralization and creates vulnerabilities in the ecosystem. Schwartz explains David Schwartz, Ripple’s chief technology officer, took the opportunity to push back. His explanation of how XRPL works painted a very different picture — one where decentralization isn’t just theoretical but a functional reality. Schwartz outlined that XRPL relies on a consensus algorithm, not proof of work, to ensure agreement on transactions. Unlike Bitcoin mining, XRPL validators are not compensated, reducing incentives to behave dishonestly or control the system. For about the 400th time, for anyone who doesn't understand what validators do:XRPL actually has a consensus algorithm that actually reaches an agreed consensus. About every five seconds, every node participates in a process to decide how to resolve the double spend problem for… — David "JoelKatz" Schwartz (@JoelKatz) January 26, 2025 Ripple’s CTO also addressed fears about forks and supply manipulation. While anyone can propose changes to XRPL, Schwartz argued, the system’s decentralized structure prevents unilateral action. Validators must reach agreement to adopt any changes, making it highly unlikely thatRipple, or anyone else, could enforce drastic modifications. card The conversation did not stop there.

--

#SOLETFsOnTheHorizon The debate surrounding Ripple, XRP Ledger (XRPL) and the possibility of XRP’s inclusion in a U.S. crypto reserve shows no signs of slowing down. The conversation, already charged with competing ideologies, took another turn when accusations of centralization were raised against Ripple. Some within the crypto community, particularly Bitcoin supporters, remain skeptical of XRP's structure, with prominent voices questioning Ripple’s role and influence. card One of the loudest critics is Pierre Rochard, VP of Research at Riot Platforms, a major Bitcoin mining firm. He has argued that Ripple could theoretically fork the XRPL software, alter escrow locks, or even introduce trillions moreXRP into the supply. For him, the control Ripple allegedly holds undermines any claims of decentralization and creates vulnerabilities in the ecosystem. Schwartz explains David Schwartz, Ripple’s chief technology officer, took the opportunity to push back. His explanation of how XRPL works painted a very different picture — one where decentralization isn’t just theoretical but a functional reality. Schwartz outlined that XRPL relies on a consensus algorithm, not proof of work, to ensure agreement on transactions. Unlike Bitcoin mining, XRPL validators are not compensated, reducing incentives to behave dishonestly or control the system. For about the 400th time, for anyone who doesn't understand what validators do:XRPL actually has a consensus algorithm that actually reaches an agreed consensus. About every five seconds, every node participates in a process to decide how to resolve the double spend problem for… — David "JoelKatz" Schwartz (@JoelKatz) January 26, 2025 Ripple’s CTO also addressed fears about forks and supply manipulation. While anyone can propose changes to XRPL, Schwartz argued, the system’s decentralized structure prevents unilateral action. Validators must reach agreement to adopt any changes, making it highly unlikely thatRipple, or anyone else, could enforce drastic modifications. card

--

PAWS is the new top dog! 🐾 Every step tells a story — let PAWS drop the truth! 🐾 Join PAWS now! https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot/PAWS?startapp=okLjhQqZ LFG! Yo, Legends! 🐾 We’re lookin’ to level up our Telegram channel, and we need your help to make it pop

--

#not

--

آخر الأخبار

Berenberg Bank Lowers U.S. GDP Growth Forecast Amid Economic Pressures

--

BNB Drops Below 580 USDT with a 2.46% Decrease in 24 Hours

--

Over 50 Nations Engage in Trade Talks with White House

--

U.S. Treasury Secretary Besant Dismisses Tariff Concerns Over Economic Recession

--

User Loses Over $128,000 in Phishing Scam

--

عرض المزيد

خريطة الموقع

تفضيلات ملفات تعريف الارتباط

شروط وأحكام المنصّة

خريطة الموقع

شروط وأحكام المنصّة

تفضيلات ملفات تعريف الارتباط

.css-1iqe90x{box-sizing:border-box;margin:0;min-width:0;color:#EAECEF;}Hamster Kombat is Scam

استكشف المزيد من صناع المُحتوى

آخر الأخبار

Hamster Kombat is Scam